Paper, Order, or Assignment Requirements
Strategic procurement depends on strong “Supplier Relationship Management” (SRM) where procurement professionals are concerned about developing robust supplier relationships and negotiating favourable terms and conditions. In the future, it is expected that supply chain structures will become more complex and choosing the right supplier will be more critical. Increasingly stringent supplier requirements will become routine, and demanding purchasers will expect suppliers to demonstrate their essential competencies. Supply chain risk, scarcity of raw materials, environmental, sustainable and economic issues will lead to increased pressure on these buyer-supplier relationships.
You are asked to critically discuss how the procurement function can manage a network – often global – of vendors and suppliers that can quickly become inoperative due to rapid shifts in the business environment. You are expected to provide appropriate case study examples to illustrate your answer.
This coursework should follow a structured approach and should be prepared and presented as a professional business report. You should undertake a relevant literature review that helps inform your investigation. Please also ensure that the Harvard Referencing System is adhered to and fully complied with.
|Use of theory||30|
|Quality of argument||10|
|Reference to course ideas||10|
|Citation and References||10|
Relates to Learning Outcomes:
- Demonstrate an understanding of the importance of procurement for global organisations operating in complex market environments.
- Locate, synthesise and critically evaluate recent/current information from a wide range of published literature in the area of Project Risk and Procurement Management.
- Apply knowledge of the theory and practice of Project Risk and Procurement Management to develop insights into and solve current problems.
- Critically evaluate the use of complex models of Project Risk and Procurement Management; systematically and creatively making sound judgements based on the systematic analysis and creative synthesis of ideas.
- Critically and effectively assess the value of theories, concepts and models to the practice of Project Risk and Procurement Management.
- Demonstrate a sound understanding of the importance of risk management in the development and maintenance of sustainable procurement.
Criterion / Mark range
(indicative – not for grading)
|Standard comparable to journal publication||Standard comparable to conference paper publication||Distinctive work for Masters level||Merit work for Masters level||Acceptable for Masters||Below Masters pass standard||Significantly below Masters pass standard|
|Scope||Outstanding clarity of focus, includes what is important, and excludes irrelevant issues.||Excellent clarity of focus, boundaries set with no significant omissions or unnecessary issues.||Clear focus. Very good setting of boundaries includes most of what is relevant.||Clear scope and focus, with some omissions or unnecessary issues.||Scope evident and satisfactory but with some omissions and unnecessary issues.||Poorly scoped, with significant omissions and unnecessary issues.||Little or no scope or focus evident.|
|Understanding of subject matter
|Outstanding with critical awareness of relevance of issues. Outstanding expression of ideas.||Excellent with critical awareness of relevance of issues. Excellent expression of ideas.||Very good with critical awareness of relevance of issues. Outstanding expression of ideas.||Good with some awareness of relevance of issues. Ideas are expressed, with some limitation.||Basic with limited awareness of relevance of issues. Limited expression of ideas.||Poor with little awareness of relevance of issues||Little or no understanding of subject matter is demonstrated.|
|Comprehensive literature review. Evaluation and synthesis of source material to produce an outstanding contribution.||Excellent independent secondary research. Sources are evaluated and synthesized to produce an excellent contribution.||Very good independent secondary research. Sources are evaluated and synthesized to produce a very good contribution.||Good secondary research to extend taught materials. Evidence of evaluation of sources, with some deficiencies in choice and synthesis.||Limited secondary research to extend taught materials. Limited evaluation of sources, deficiencies in choice and synthesis.||Little or no extension of taught materials. Poor choice and synthesis of materials.||Poor use of taught materials. No synthesis.|
|Critical analysis based on evidence||Standard of critical analysis – showing questioning of sources, understanding of bias, independence of thought||Excellent standard of critical analysis – excellence in questioning of sources, understanding of bias, independence of thought||A very good standard of critical analysis. Sources are questioned appropriately, and a very good understanding of bias, showing independence of thought||Critical analysis with some questioning of sources, understanding of bias, independence of thought.||Analysis evident but uncritical. Sources are not always questioned, with limited independence of thought.||Little or no analysis.||No valid analysis.|
|Structure of argument, leading to conclusion||Well structured, compelling and persuasive argument that leads to a valuable contribution to the field of study, paving the way for future work.||Argument has excellent structure and persuasiveness, leading to very significant insights and relevant future work.||Well-structured and persuasive argument Insightful conclusion draws together key issues and possible future work.||Structured and fairly convincing argument leads to conclusion that summarises key issues.||Argument has some structure and development towards conclusion with limitations in summary of issues.||Argument is unstructured, no recognizable conclusion.||No evidence of argument or conclusion.|